Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a 91.1 score against 80.7. Even though the Galaxy A52s is extremely newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. The Galaxy A52s's CPU is very similar to the Google Pixel 3 XL one, and although the Galaxy A52s has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A52s counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 31% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.