Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than Galaxy A70, getting an 80.7 score against 76.9. Google Pixel 3 XL's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A70, but it's a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Google Pixel 3 XL has a greater camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.