Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, with a 92.9 score against 80.7. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it is a little heavier and a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot larger sensor and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G UW, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.