Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (but slower).
Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much more MP camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.