Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, having a 90.8 score against 80.7. The Galaxy Note 20 body is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL's, but it is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.