Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL's global score of 80.7. Galaxy Note10 is a just a little bit lighter device than Google Pixel 3 XL, but both of them are equally thin. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments.
The Galaxy Note10 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery lifetime is just as good as the Google Pixel 3 XL one, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a 3500mAh battery size against 3430mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.