Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 score. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL's, although it's just a little thicker and a little heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lesser MP camera in the back, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.