Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a 93.6 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL and Galaxy S10 5G both have very similar displays, because although the Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a less megapixels camera in the back, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3430mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.