Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting an 89.7 score against 80.7. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is newer, but a little thicker and just a bit heavier than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels, faster video frame rates and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite features improved battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.