Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than Google Pixel 3 XL, but they have the same thickness. The Galaxy S10e has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2960, a bit larger display and a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy S10e captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lower resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3430mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.