Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 80.7 score against 77.6. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a much larger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.