Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is newer, but noticeably thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4050mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a camera that's very similar to the Google Pixel 3 XL one, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way smaller sensor shooting way worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.