Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer, just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a back camera with lesser MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size and a F1.8 diafragm aperture. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.