Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a bit better than Xperia XZs's 77.2 global score. Google Pixel 3 XL is a newer and a bit thinner phone than the Xperia XZs, but it is heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit faster CPU than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has 4 more cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid display than Xperia XZs, because it has a little bit higher pixels number in each inch in the display, a bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Xperia XZs features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size. The Sony Xperia XZs captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with higher video frame rates, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos and a camera in the back with a way higher 19 mega pixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.