Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3's score of 78.2. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot older than the Xiaomi Poco M3, it's design is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a way higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it costs more than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.