Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with a global score of 80.7 against 78.2. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it's a bit heavier and was released many years before. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as Google Pixel 3 XL's one, they have equal internal memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, they both have the same aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.