Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with an 80.7 score against 76.6. Google Pixel 3 XL's design is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a much larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.