Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.