Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. Even though Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it is just a little thicker and way heavier. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better resolution of 1242 x 2688, a quite higher display density and a larger screen.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max's storage capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to Google Pixel 3's one, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 aperture and a 0.39 inches camera sensor. IPhone 11 Pro Max features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.