Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a 93.3 score against 80. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but also much heavier than Google Pixel 3. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a brighter display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532, a just a bit higher pixels density and a little bit larger screen.
IPhone 13 Pro features a much better storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 6 percent larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.