Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro is better than Google Pixel 3, having a 95.6 score against 80. The iPhone 14 Pro design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3, but it's a lot heavier. IPhone 14 Pro features a sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels and a bit higher display density.
IPhone 14 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a better performing CPU than Google Pixel 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. IPhone 14 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.