Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3's 80 general score. IPhone 7's design is a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3, although it was released many years before. Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better screen than iPhone 7, because it has a bigger display, a higher count of pixels per display inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
IPhone 7 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than iPhone 7, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3 features a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 2915mAh battery capacity instead of 1960mAh.
Google Pixel 3 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 7, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 3 also has a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.