Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Even though iPhone 8 Plus is older and much heavier than Google Pixel 3, it's body is still a little thinner. IPhone 8 Plus has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 8 Plus captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, they both have a same size aperture. The Google Pixel 3 features just a little better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 2915mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.