Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than the Google Pixel 3, having a general score of 88.1 against 80. Even though iPhone X is older and heavier than Google Pixel 3, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. Apple iPhone X has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit greater pixels number in each screen inch.
Apple iPhone X has a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. IPhone X counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. IPhone X shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP, a worse (4K) video quality and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs, they both have the same aperture.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.