Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 overall score. Even being the best in this comparison review, Apple iPhone XR is a noticeably heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3. The iPhone XR counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little sharper display than iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a less mega pixels resolution back camera, they both have a same size back camera sensor and a same size diafragm aperture.
IPhone XR has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Google Pixel 3, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone XR features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 2942mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.