Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3, with an 82.9 score against 80. Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, although it is a little thicker and incredibly heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 4 XL and Google Pixel 3 count with really similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL's camera is very similar to the camera in Google Pixel 3, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same resolution camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.