Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 general score. Google Pixel 3's construction has the same thickness than the Honor 50 Pro, but it's a lot lighter. The Honor 50 Pro has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor 50 Pro and Google Pixel 3 feature similar screens, although the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger screen, a better 1236 x 2676 resolution and a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch. Honor 50 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Honor 50 Pro has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory. The Honor 50 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.