Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 439 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than Honor Magic 6 Pro's overall score of 76.6. Google Pixel 3 is a thinner and much lighter phone than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution and a quite higher pixel density.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a lot larger sensor, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much bigger camera aperture and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Honor Magic 6 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity. Honor Magic 6 Pro has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 92 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.