Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 439 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than the Google Pixel 3, with a 92.1 score against 80. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's design is a lot newer than the Google Pixel 3's, but it's incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger screen, a little greater pixel quantity per display inch and a better resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, a much larger aperture and a way larger sensor.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.