Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. LG G8X ThinQ's design is newer than Google Pixel 3's, although it's extremely heavier and just a bit thicker. The LG G8X ThinQ has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount per inch in the display. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2915mAh. LG G8X ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a lower resolution camera in the back, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.