Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the LG K52's 76 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 is an much older phone than the LG K52, but Google managed to build it much lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 features a better screen than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a much higher display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K52. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory. LG K52 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG K52 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the LG K52 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The LG K52 has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.