Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3, getting an 85.4 score against 80. LG K92's construction is much newer than Google Pixel 3's, but it is notably heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each inch of display.
The LG K92 features much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better hardware performance than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG K92 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG K92 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.