Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than LG Q70's 77.9 global score. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3 is older than the LG Q70, it's construction is noticeably lighter and just a bit thinner. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a little higher display density. LG Q70 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The LG Q70 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.