Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the LG V10, with a score of 80 against 78.6. Google Pixel 3 is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also a little bit thinner and way lighter than the LG V10. Google Pixel 3 counts with a more powerful processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger number of faster cores.
LG V10 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a bit larger display and a quite better pixel number per inch of display. The LG V10 features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V10 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a way higher resolution camera and faster video frame rates.
The LG V10 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.