Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ and Google Pixel 3 were only released with a couple of months difference, the LG V30S ThinQ body is a little heavier but a little bit thinner. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a little better pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a quite bigger display. LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.