Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 81.3 score against 80. The LG V35 ThinQ design is just a little bit thinner but a little heavier than Google Pixel 3, and they were only released with a couple months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ takes a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.