Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 80. Even though LG V40 ThinQ and Google Pixel 3 were only released 0 months apart, the LG V40 ThinQ construction is heavier but also just a bit thinner. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bit greater display density, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bigger display. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, a back camera with less mega-pixels and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.