Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's score of 80. LG V60 ThinQ's design is newer than Google Pixel 3's, but it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.