Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. Although the LG Wing is newer than Google Pixel 3, it's notably heavier and way thicker. LG Wing counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen. LG Wing counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG Wing features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG Wing counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the LG Wing also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, better video frame rates and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.