Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is better than Google Pixel 3, having a score of 89.6 against 80. The Motorola edge design is newer than the Google Pixel 3's, but it's noticeably heavier and thicker. The Motorola edge and Google Pixel 3 both feature really similar processors, and although the Motorola edge has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity in each inch in the display. Motorola edge has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola edge also has a back facing camera with lot more MP and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola edge counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Motorola edge has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola edge, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.