Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a score of 83.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 general score. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a just a little heavier device than the Google Pixel 3, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and better video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 38 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.