Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40, getting a global score of 80 against 77.2. The Google Pixel 3 is a older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 40, but Google could make it somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 40 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 51% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.