Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3, getting an 81.9 score against 80. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is noticeably newer than the Google Pixel 3's, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 1256 x 2760px resolution, a quite higher pixels density and a larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4310mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.