Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 global score. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it's just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 448 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a way bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.