Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with a overall score of 87.1 against 80. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer phone than Google Pixel 3, although it's a bit thicker and way heavier. The Google Pixel 3 features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2915mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a way higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.