Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 81.5 score against 80. The Moto G 5G design is noticeably newer than the Google Pixel 3's, although it's much thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The Moto G 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Moto G 5G also has a bigger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Moto G 5G has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.