Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 overall score. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's body is newer, but much heavier and somewhat thicker than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G 5G Plus features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% greater battery capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much more megapixels back camera, a larger aperture and a way larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.