Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than the Moto G Power, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Power takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The Moto G Power features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a little more than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.