Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), having an 80 score against 79.3. Google Pixel 3 is an notably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but Google was able to build it thinner and extremely lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus (2021). They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen. The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a bigger aperture and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.