Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Google Pixel 3, having an 86.2 score against 80. Moto G200 5G's body is notably newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a quite better pixel density.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
The Moto G200 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Moto G200 5G features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.